| |

In the fall of 2004, child sponsor Linda
Richardson left her home outside Edmonton, Alberta to board a
plane for Africa. She went to visit her sister Barbara Richardson,
who is Political Counsellor, Canadian High Commission, Nairobi,
Kenya. There, Linda was closer than she’s ever been to Lweru,
Uganda, home of her sponsored child Stephene Senfuma. Though she
was in Uganda for only one day, Linda will never forget a minute
of it. In her own words, this is Linda’s story:
Why go?
As a sponsor, it’s great to get a photograph
and updated information about your sponsored child, but it’s
nice to go and see for yourself, make sure the money is being
spent wisely; find out more about him, his family and community.
And I’d never been to Uganda so just wanted to experience
what it was like.
First impressions
It’s beautiful, more humid and tropical than
Kenya, more of what I pictured Africa to be. The cities are busy,
crowded, lots of struggling people, but there is obviously industry
going on. I saw tea fields and lots of manufacturing.
I flew into Entebbe and was met at the airport
by Feed The Children Uganda (FTCU) staff. We then drove to Kampala
and FTCU headquarters. They happened to have all management staff
in for a meeting, so they asked me to come in to meet them all.
They asked me for my impressions, which was a bit unexpected,
but I was happy to give my input.
The visit
Then we were off to visit Stephene in his community
of Lweru. The roads were great until closer to the village, when
they became very bumpy and narrow. I’d been on safari in
Kenya, so was used to bad roads. We stopped first at Stephene’s
school to meet him. He was very shy. From his photos, I imagined
he would be taller, more muscular, but he seemed small for his
age, which is not unusual I suppose. He does understand quite
a bit of English, though doesn’t speak much. We had a whole
entourage, so he was a bit intimidated. We toured the school,
visited the headmaster and met Stephene’s teacher. I had
been to a school in Nairobi slums – and found this one to
be better built. I thought it looked sturdy, had a well for fresh
water – very functional, but basic.
The staff taught me some expressions in the local
language of Luganda. (I’m happy to meet you; Okay; Thank
you very much.) That was very helpful. The villagers grinned widely
when you said a few little phrases, but then they thought I spoke
the language, so would start speaking to me in Luganda, but I
had to tell them, No that’s all I know!
Stephene’s home
We visited Stephen’s mother’s house.
His mother is a widow with eight children and, when you’re
a widow, your children are considered orphans. Stephene is the
second eldest. I met his aunts, uncles, grandparents, cousins
– we had lots of introductions. They kind of kneel down
to greet you, which I wasn’t expecting. That’s considered
a polite greeting. I went into his house – very basic: mud,
clay bricks, dirt floor. His bedroom had dirt floors, with scraps
of cloth to sleep on. There was mosquito netting given by Canadian Feed The Children.
And a shelf with mementos. There was a separate kitchen outside,
a latrine and a bath house with walls, but no roof. They use a
communal well for water. The program includes hygiene education,
where FTCU staff teach villagers about better sanitation –
such as building drying racks to keep dishes away from the dirt.
We went to Stephene’s mother’s garden. There is a
lot of subsistence farming in the area and, like many families,
they grow the crops they eat – beans, cassava, coffee, fruit
trees, and vanilla as a cash crop. Stephene had a little rabbit
hutch that he tends, using some rabbits to feed the family and
selling others.
Gift giving
I’d brought some gifts for Stephene and some
supplies for the school, but I felt guilty for not bringing something
for the family. Stephene made me a beautiful basket and a straw
mat, which I will put on my patio table in the summertime. His
mother gave me a beautiful purple and white mat that she had made.
Although they have nothing, they offer these gifts. It touched
me so much; I was on the verge of tears.
Then they gave me a rooster; they just kind of
plopped it in my lap. Well, you can imagine my surprise. This
is considered a very extravagant gift. I don’t know where
they got it. What does one do? I accepted it with great thanks.
Then, after I left, I asked FTCU staff to find another family
who could use it. They decided on a family that had a boy who
was ill, and the mother didn’t have much, so she could either
make soup out of it or sell it. We drove back in an open truck,
the rooster was in back, and when we got to Kampala, we got worried
that someone might take it. We wanted to get it in the right hands,
without it being stolen.
I think over the years that we have sponsored
a child it would have been nice to have more direct communication
with Stephene and the ability to give him gifts of some sort.
However, having been to Lweru and seen what the sponsorship money
enables in terms of community development, and understanding the
remoteness and difficulty that would be involved in getting letters
to and from sponsored children, I can see why Canadian Feed The Children doesn’t
want to spend funds each year to support that kind of communication.
As a sponsor, I do like to receive updated photos of Stephene
and updated reports on his progress, etc. I think that sponsors
should be made more aware of Canadian Feed The Children’s policy regarding gifts
and letters. Initially, my family – especially my daughters
– expected to receive at least one letter each year from
Stephene. That is probably a common expectation among sponsors.
Partnership
The FTCU staff were great. We drove back to Kampala
and had a typical Uganda meal. They had gone out of their way
to make sure I saw as much as possible in a short time. They filled
me in on the current issues about the program, which gave me an
idea of what Canadian Feed The Children does when partnering with a community –
not really direct implementers of the programs, but funding them.
I thought that was fine. I just assumed Canadian Feed The Children was delivering programs,
but I wasn’t taken aback that Canadian Feed The Children partners with organizations
on the ground. They know what their communities need and it’s
employment in the country. It makes sense to deliver programs
that way. When I was meeting, they talked about where they’re
moving, their strategic plan – for more community programs.
When you sponsor a child, you sponsor the family and indirectly
the village. I understand in that community, there are a number
of sponsors, there’s so much being developed within the
community and, hopefully, as time goes on, the organization can
move out of the community because they would have developed the
resources themselves. I think it’s a very smart strategy:
Get the resources in the hands of the community and let them run
with them.
Lasting impact
I think the trip brought home to me how much needs
to be done but how small deeds can really produce great things
in the long run. By sponsoring a child, you’re providing
them with a better education, health care, food. In extreme poverty,
there’s great difficulty in getting employment. The interesting
thing that I learned was that the focus on education is very high.
I was quite surprised, given that families are so poor and sometimes
have to purchase uniforms and, moving on to secondary school,
it’s hard to finance for many families. As a sponsor, you’re
really focusing on improving the next generation.
Our great thanks to Linda for sharing her story
with us, and for her continued support through sponsorship.
|
|